The Gay Lobby's "Plan B"

Tonight the voters in 7 states will go to the polls to decide the issue of same sex marriage in their states (Colorado voters will decide twice). If the past is any guide, most will vote to protect traditional marriage. That may be a good sign, but in the long run, it won't matter.

The gay lobby, like most of the left wing, has a backup plan for what to do when they lose at the ballot box. Yes, the liberals are for the people but when the people disagree with them, they are quick to find another way to get what they want and tell the people to stick it.

Marriage protection has focused thus far on defining marriage in a particular jurisdiction as a union between a man and a woman. But the gay lobby has found a loophole, there is no definition of man and woman.

That's right, if they can't win same sex marriage, they will work to redefine gender itself.

The New York Times (reg. required) carried the story today that the New York City Board of Health was considering making it legal for anyone born in the city to choose to change their gender on their birth certificate even without surgery to physically alter their sex.

Yup,you knew it had to happen sooner or later. Born with a penis but want to be a woman? Simply apply for the change and viola, your birth certificate now shows you to be a woman, anatomy be damned! Born a woman, want to be a man? Done.

So, even if marriage is defined by law as a man-woman union, a man can simply declare himself a woman and his marriage is legal.

Joann Prinzivalli, 52, a lawyer for the New York Transgender Rights Organization, a man who has lived as a woman since 2000, without surgery, said the changes amount to progress, a move away from American culture's misguided fixation on genitals as the basis for one's gender identity.

"It's based on an arbitrary distinction that says there are two and only two sexes," she said. "In reality the diversity of nature is such that there are more than just two, and people who seem to belong to one of the designated sexes may really belong to the other."

The diversity of nature is such that this guy/girl is one sick piece of work! And the left tries to claim that the conservatives are anti-science on the embryonic stem cell issue. This one can't even figure out basic biology.

Years ago, the gay lobby assured us that their movement was all about what consenting adults could do in the privacy of their own bedrooms. But the lie is revealed now. Their movement is about forcing a new paradigm on the entire society. Every perversion is now normal and every pathology is to be celebrated. In fact, normal no longer exists, instead we have diversity of normalcy.

It's now about them defining your relationship with your spouse. It's about you being forced to acknowledge their "private life" as virtuous.

Mark my words, other perversions will follow, when personal choice becomes the basis of what marriage should be, then how can we stop polygamy and incest from being granted legal sanction. "Don't be ridiculous," you protest? Well, did you ever think you would see us actually debating if anatomy should determine your gender?

Remember the old life of Brian film from Monty Python?

Stan: I want to be one.
Reg, Francis: What?
Stan: I want to be a woman. From now on, I want you all to call me "Loretta".
Reg: Wha'?
Loretta: It's my right as a man.
Judith: Well, why do you want to be Loretta, Stan?
Loretta: I want to have babies.
Reg: You want to have babies?!
Loretta: It's every man's right to have babies if he wants them.
Reg: But... you can't have babies.
Loretta: Don't you oppress me!
Reg: I'm not oppressing you, Stan, you haven't got a womb! Where's the fetus gonna gestate? You gonna keep it in a box?
[Stan/Loretta starts to cry.]
Judith: Here! I-I've got an idea. Suppose that you agree that he can't actually have babies, not having a womb, which is nobody's fault, not even the Romans', but that he can have the right to have babies.
Francis: Good idea, Judith. We shall fight the oppressors for your right to have babies, brother. Sister, sorry.
Reg: Wh-what's the point?
Francis: Wha'?
Reg: What's the point of fighting for his right to have babies when he can't have babies?
Francis: It is symbolic of our struggle against oppression.
Reg: It's symbolic of his struggle against reality.

There you have it, comedy has become a sad pathetic fact of our political life. If you have been on the fence about the gay rights movement, or should we say the GLBT movement, its time you wake up and face the fact that this is not about consenting adults, etc. etc. This is about remaking our entire society, the family itself into the vision hatched in the dark minds of some of the most deranged among us. And other perversions are sure to follow.

But, hey, let's look for the silver lining. I've been told, and often felt, I was born in the wrong era. I think as a transera individual I would like my birth certificate to read that I was born in the 1930s. That makes me eligible for social security benefits; which is great because I sure as heck won't ever see any benefits when my chronological age reaches that point. But after all, isn't the actual calendar year in which one was born a rather arbitrary method for determining age.

Can I also change my race? Country of origin? This could be great, let me just change my kids' information too so that they will be eligible for more programs, scholarships and quotas when it comes time for college and the workplace.

I could author a new text book that could become mandatory in future kindergarten classrooms: Jessica Had Two Mommies, But One Of Them Is Now Her Daddy, Except That Now Jessica Wants To Be A Boy Named Tyler And Is Himself A Mommy Of A Child Named Sven Who Has Yet To Find Comfort In His/Her Own Gender Identity.

Oh, and if I am anatomically male, but identify as female, I can now use that deodorant that is "strong enough for a man but made for a woman" and you can't stop me!

By the way, there is more on this sick development at:
Hot Air
NY 1